>>14566>Women are supposed to be petitehere you set up the idea that femininity is measured by how close one is to an ideal form of a woman and then go on to claim that something that doesn't even resemble a human is closer to that form. given that femininity is certainly different for each species (what a peacock considers masculine differs greatly from what a deer does) this claim is absurd.
>ponies are almost small enough to roll in a ball on your laphas the size of ponies actually been established in the show? it doesn't matter. you seem to be claiming that there is no lower limit as to what the size of a woman should ideally be which is ridiculous.
>the shapes of women is supposed to have curves everywherespecific curves in specific places. breasts, for example, which ponies don't have. when these curves are in the wrong places or there are more of them we do not say a woman is more feminine we say she is deformed
your points aboot eyes and facial expressions while true is equally true aboot animated human women
>unlike humans they can roll in a ball, or lay prone on their belly, and it all contributes to making them smallercomfier, cuddlier etcwomen can lie on their bellies. cuddling a human who can hold your hands in hers or wrap her arms around you is better. human on human compatibility is superior to human on horse.
>it's of course not clear what they are made oot of, but it's probably something extremely soft, softer than the softer fur of any animal on earth, probably as soft as bird duvetwhat are you going on here? is this really established at any point in the show? is there really an indication of the squishiness of ponies? i'm doubtful
>being with a woman means being constantly vigilant and constantly alert for the trouble she spends all her time brewing>Obliviously, with ponies, you don't have thattrue but equally true of any animated woman
1/2